Main

related bits

0

processing priority

4

site type

0 (generic, awaiting analysis)

review version

11

html import

20 (imported)

Events

first seen date

2025-08-07 11:33:30

expired found date

-

created at

2025-05-10 01:02:37

updated at

2026-02-04 15:42:41

Domain name statistics

length

13

crc

26854

tld

2688

nm parts

0

nm random digits

0

nm rare letters

0

Connections

is subdomain of id

-

previous id

0

replaced with id

0

related id

-

dns primary id

13642151

dns alternative id

0

lifecycle status

0 (unclassified, or currently active)

Subdomains and pages

deleted subdomains

0

page imported products

0

page imported random

0

page imported parking

0

Error counters

count skipped due to recent timeouts on the same server IP

0

count content received but rejected due to 11-799

0

count dns errors

0

count cert errors

0

count timeouts

0

count http 429

0

count http 404

0

count http 403

0

count http 5xx

0

next operation date

-

Server

server bits

server ip

-

Mainpage statistics

mp import status

20

mp rejected date

-

mp saved date

-

mp size orig

95753

mp size raw text

20793

mp inner links count

37

mp inner links status

10 (links queued, awaiting import)

Open Graph

title

daveverse

description

Dave's WordPress home in the Fediverse :-)

site name

daveverse

author

updated

2026-03-09 10:02:48

raw text

daveverse – Dave's WordPress home in the Fediverse :-) daveverse Dave's WordPress home in the Fediverse :-) Reinventing is bad for interop August 4, 2025 by Dave Winer A spec from the ActivityPub universe, the intro begins: ActivityPoll is a proper subset of ActivityPub that excludes activity delivery, making it easier to implement for static Web sites or content management systems. It meets an equivalent need to RSS or Atom feeds. That's where I stopped reading. Isn't this a pretty good clue that the support should be the other way around. That full-featured ActivityPub servers should understand and emit RSS and/or Atom? Why do we need another format? If you want easy adoption, use formats that the sites already support. If you need new features, define a namespace, and add them there.  Imho, that's exactly how ActivityPub itself should have been developed. Would've saved us a lot of time, driven more interop sooner, and would have provide...

Text analysis

redirect type

0 (-)

block type

0 (no issues)

detected language

1 (English)

category id

Zastosowania AI (149)

index version

1

spam phrases

0

Text statistics

text nonlatin

0

text cyrillic

0

text characters

15917

text words

3618

text unique words

1096

text lines

317

text sentences

223

text paragraphs

55

text words per sentence

16

text matched phrases

0

text matched dictionaries

0

RSS

rss status

32 (unknown)

rss found date

2025-08-21 05:42:25

rss size orig

21893

rss items

10

rss spam phrases

0

rss detected language

1 (English)

inbefore feed id

-

inbefore status

0 (new)

Sitemap

sitemap status

30 (processing completed, results pushed to table crawler_sitemaps.ext_domain_sitemap_lists)

sitemap review version

2

sitemap urls count

683

sitemap urls adult

0

sitemap filtered products

0

sitemap filtered videos

0

sitemap found date

2025-09-20 22:49:54

sitemap process date

2026-02-04 15:42:41

sitemap first import date

-

sitemap last import date

-