id
processing priority
2
site type
3 (personal blog or private political site, e.g. Blogspot, Substack, also small blogs on own domains)
review version
11
html import
20 (imported)
first seen date
2024-08-12 03:20:08
expired found date
-
created at
2024-08-12 03:20:08
updated at
2026-02-15 23:06:57
length
32
crc
2699
tld
2211
nm parts
0
nm random digits
0
nm rare letters
0
is subdomain of id
69893241 (blogspot.com)
previous id
0
replaced with id
0
related id
-
dns primary id
0
dns alternative id
0
lifecycle status
0 (unclassified, or currently active)
deleted subdomains
0
page imported products
0
page imported random
0
page imported parking
0
count skipped due to recent timeouts on the same server IP
0
count content received but rejected due to 11-799
0
count dns errors
0
count cert errors
0
count timeouts
0
count http 429
0
count http 404
0
count http 403
0
count http 5xx
0
next operation date
-
server bits
—
server ip
-
mp import status
20
mp rejected date
-
mp saved date
-
mp size orig
193106
mp size raw text
58199
mp inner links count
53
mp inner links status
20 (imported)
title
Evolutionary Novelties
description
A blog mainly about evolution. But sometimes linguistics or baseball.
image
site name
author
updated
2026-02-14 13:56:41
raw text
Evolutionary Novelties Evolutionary Novelties A blog mainly about evolution. But sometimes linguistics or baseball. Saturday, July 29, 2017 How many manuscripts to review? Question from a colleague about how many manuscripts to review: I saw your note about being awash with review requests on Twitter. I'm just curious what your opinion is on the number of papers we should agree to review per month; i.e. What is professionally responsible? I still learning the rules here on when is OK to say no to things. My fairly off-the-cuff response (although it is something I've thought about over the years): Well, I don’t think there is any rule at all against saying ’no’; especially to review a paper. Before agreeing to review, I must: 1. Be very interested to read the manuscript 2. Confident I am qualified to critique at least 1 major aspect of the paper 3. Not be reviewing more than 2 other manuscripts already at the time (unless REALLY interested in it) 4. Fe...
redirect type
0 (-)
block type
0 (no issues)
detected language
1 (English)
category id
index version
1
spam phrases
0
text nonlatin
0
text cyrillic
0
text characters
45737
text words
9493
text unique words
2376
text lines
436
text sentences
687
text paragraphs
140
text words per sentence
13
text matched phrases
0
text matched dictionaries
0
links self subdomains
0
links other subdomains
3 - t.umblr.com
links other domains
51 - portoflosangeles.org, ocregister.com, paperpile.com, netvibes.com, istockphoto.com
links spam adult
0
links spam random
0
links spam expired
0
links ext activities
0
links ext ecommerce
0
links ext finance
0
links ext crypto
0
links ext booking
0
links ext news
2
links ext leaks
0
links ext ugc
49 - blogger.com, draft.blogger.com, twitter.com, dropbox.com, judgestarling.tumblr.com
links ext klim
0
links ext generic
0
dol status
0
dol updated
2026-02-14 13:56:41
rss status
32 (unknown)
rss found date
2024-09-10 10:53:42
rss size orig
428981
rss items
25
rss spam phrases
1
rss detected language
1 (English)
inbefore feed id
-
inbefore status
0 (new)
sitemap path
sitemap status
30 (processing completed, results pushed to table crawler_sitemaps.ext_domain_sitemap_lists)
sitemap review version
2
sitemap urls count
110
sitemap urls adult
0
sitemap filtered products
0
sitemap filtered videos
0
sitemap found date
2024-09-04 18:38:52
sitemap process date
2025-09-21 21:39:15
sitemap first import date
-
sitemap last import date
-