id
processing priority
4
site type
0 (generic, awaiting analysis)
review version
11
html import
20 (imported)
first seen date
2024-02-01 12:27:13
expired found date
-
created at
2024-06-05 20:37:11
updated at
2025-12-28 13:20:09
length
19
crc
10229
tld
2211
nm parts
0
nm random digits
0
nm rare letters
0
is subdomain of id
-
previous id
0
replaced with id
0
related id
-
dns primary id
dns alternative id
0
lifecycle status
0 (unclassified, or currently active)
deleted subdomains
0
page imported products
0
page imported random
0
page imported parking
0
count skipped due to recent timeouts on the same server IP
0
count content received but rejected due to 11-799
0
count dns errors
0
count cert errors
0
count timeouts
0
count http 429
0
count http 404
0
count http 403
0
count http 5xx
0
next operation date
-
server bits
—
server ip
-
mp import status
20
mp rejected date
-
mp saved date
-
mp size orig
116701
mp size raw text
34010
mp inner links count
0
mp inner links status
20 (imported)
title
description
-
image
site name
author
updated
2025-12-16 06:22:38
raw text
Skip to content Skip to content Home all SCOTUS cases and links State Opinions and Some U.S.D.C. Opinions Most Recent SCOTUS Cases Notes on Use ← Older posts E.D.Mich.: Def showed enough to reopen his suppression hearing which is usually frowned on Posted on February 1, 2024 by Hall Defendant’s motion to reopen his suppression hearing is granted. “To resolve Defendant’s motion, the Court must determine whether Defendant has provided a sufficient explanation for failing to present at the suppression hearing the evidence that Defendant now wishes to introduce. If Defendant has made such a showing, then the Court must consider (1) whether Defendant’s motion is timely; (2) the character of the evidence that Defendant would introduce; (3) the effect reopening the suppression hearing; and (4) whether the Government will be prejudiced if the suppression hearing is reopened. See United States v. Holland, 522 F. App’x 265, 270 (6th Cir. 2013). Defendant provided a suf...
redirect type
31 (document.location)
block type
0 (no issues)
detected language
1 (English)
category id
index version
2025110801
spam phrases
0
text nonlatin
0
text cyrillic
0
text characters
24877
text words
5282
text unique words
1466
text lines
700
text sentences
412
text paragraphs
59
text words per sentence
12
text matched phrases
1
text matched dictionaries
11
links self subdomains
0
links other subdomains
7 - lp.findlaw.com, web.lexis.com, scrolling.blogs.com, caselaw.lp.findlaw.com
links other domains
37 - fastcompany.com, kscourts.org, abajournal.com, lexisnexis.com, johnwesleyhall.com, pinterest.ca, lexisweb.com, lexisone.com, scotusblog.com, scotusreport.com, abanet.org, oyez.org, law.com, crimelynx.com, lexis.com, westlaw.com, fd.org, thepiratebay.org, fas.org, aclu.org, privacyfoundation.org, eff.org, nacdl.org, epic.org, section1983blog.com, bailii.org
links spam adult
0
links spam random
0
links spam expired
0
links ext activities
2
links ext ecommerce
0
links ext finance
0
links ext crypto
0
links ext booking
0
links ext news
4
links ext leaks
0
links ext ugc
1 - wordpress.org
links ext klim
0
links ext generic
50
dol status
0
dol updated
2025-12-16 06:22:38
rss status
32 (unknown)
rss found date
2025-02-28 23:36:13
rss size orig
15743
rss items
17
rss spam phrases
0
rss detected language
1 (English)
inbefore feed id
-
inbefore status
0 (new)
sitemap path
sitemap status
1 (priority 1 already searched, no matches found)
sitemap review version
1
sitemap urls count
0
sitemap urls adult
0
sitemap filtered products
0
sitemap filtered videos
0
sitemap found date
-
sitemap process date
-
sitemap first import date
-
sitemap last import date
-