id
processing priority
4
site type
3 (personal blog or private political site, e.g. Blogspot, Substack, also small blogs on own domains)
review version
11
html import
20 (imported)
first seen date
2024-09-14 01:57:35
expired found date
-
created at
2024-09-14 01:57:35
updated at
2025-04-22 20:55:47
length
26
crc
27742
tld
2211
nm parts
0
nm random digits
0
nm rare letters
0
is subdomain of id
13642151 (wordpress.com)
previous id
0
replaced with id
0
related id
-
dns primary id
0
dns alternative id
0
lifecycle status
0 (unclassified, or currently active)
deleted subdomains
0
page imported products
0
page imported random
0
page imported parking
0
count skipped due to recent timeouts on the same server IP
0
count content received but rejected due to 11-799
0
count dns errors
0
count cert errors
0
count timeouts
0
count http 429
0
count http 404
0
count http 403
0
count http 5xx
0
next operation date
-
server bits
—
server ip
-
mp import status
20
mp rejected date
-
mp saved date
-
mp size orig
117591
mp size raw text
13466
mp inner links count
9
mp inner links status
10 (links queued, awaiting import)
title
JournalGuide News
description
the latest updates from JournalGuide
site name
JournalGuide News
author
updated
2026-03-07 04:04:20
raw text
JournalGuide News | the latest updates from JournalGuide Skip to primary content Skip to secondary content JournalGuide News the latest updates from JournalGuide Search Main menu go to JournalGuide.com Is this journal legit? Now you can find out on JournalGuide. Posted on September 3, 2014 by Research Square Reply Do you get emails from journals you’ve never heard of that ask you to review for them or to join their editorial boards? How about “call for papers” emails or conference announcements from unfamiliar journals? How do you find out whether or not those journals are reputable? You can find tons of articles and posts on hijacked journals and predatory publishers, including Beall’s famous list of criteria for identifying predatory publishers, a “ CRAAP ” test for journals, and a detailed academic paper outlining all the steps you should follow to figure out if a journal is reputable. These are all great suggestions, but that’s a lot of work ...
redirect type
0 (-)
block type
0 (no issues)
detected language
1 (English)
category id
Pozostałe (16)
index version
1
spam phrases
0
text nonlatin
0
text cyrillic
0
text characters
10512
text words
2024
text unique words
691
text lines
248
text sentences
88
text paragraphs
23
text words per sentence
23
text matched phrases
0
text matched dictionaries
0
links self subdomains
0
links other subdomains
links other domains
7 - journalguide.com, scholarlyoa.com, alpsp.org, alpspconference.org, journalmetrics.com
links spam adult
0
links spam random
0
links spam expired
0
links ext activities
4
links ext ecommerce
0
links ext finance
0
links ext crypto
0
links ext booking
0
links ext news
0
links ext leaks
0
links ext ugc
28 - s0.wp.com, wp.me, secure.gravatar.com, s1.wp.com, mariemcveigh.wordpress.com, twitter.com, wordpress.com
links ext klim
0
links ext generic
0
dol status
0
dol updated
2026-03-07 04:04:20
rss status
32 (unknown)
rss found date
2024-09-14 23:46:00
rss size orig
33827
rss items
4
rss spam phrases
0
rss detected language
1 (English)
inbefore feed id
-
inbefore status
0 (new)
sitemap path
sitemap status
1 (priority 1 already searched, no matches found)
sitemap review version
2
sitemap urls count
0
sitemap urls adult
0
sitemap filtered products
0
sitemap filtered videos
0
sitemap found date
-
sitemap process date
-
sitemap first import date
-
sitemap last import date
-