id
related bits
0
processing priority
4
site type
3 (personal blog or private political site, e.g. Blogspot, Substack, also small blogs on own domains)
review version
11
html import
20 (imported)
first seen date
2024-12-29 10:47:27
expired found date
-
created at
2024-12-29 10:47:26
updated at
2026-01-12 01:41:46
length
23
crc
38353
tld
2211
nm parts
0
nm random digits
0
nm rare letters
0
is subdomain of id
13642151 (wordpress.com)
previous id
0
replaced with id
0
related id
-
dns primary id
0
dns alternative id
0
lifecycle status
0 (unclassified, or currently active)
deleted subdomains
0
page imported products
0
page imported random
0
page imported parking
0
count skipped due to recent timeouts on the same server IP
0
count content received but rejected due to 11-799
0
count dns errors
0
count cert errors
0
count timeouts
0
count http 429
0
count http 404
0
count http 403
0
count http 5xx
0
next operation date
-
server bits
—
server ip
-
mp import status
20
mp rejected date
-
mp saved date
-
mp size orig
262348
mp size raw text
39518
mp inner links count
16
mp inner links status
20 (imported)
title
市區重建策略檢討--草根觀點
description
Just another WordPress.com weblog
image
site name
市區重建策略檢討--草根觀點
author
updated
2026-01-10 13:39:14
raw text
市區重建策略檢討--草根觀點 | Just another WordPress.com weblog 市區重建策略檢討–草根觀點 Just another WordPress.com weblog 直接觀看文章 主頁 為何設這網站? ← 較舊的文章 發展局之新《市區重建策略》擬稿之三大主要倒退點： Posted on 17 十一月, 2010 by urbanrenewaltv | 發表留言 發展局之新《市區重建策略》擬稿之三大主要倒退點： 如果與舊有的《市區重建策略》比較，新的策略更倒退的地方主要有三大點： 一）社區網絡地位降低 新舊策略的第 5 條均是關於市區更新的主要目標，舊策略的第 5i 條是無條件地保留社區網絡，但新策略則改為「 (i) 在 切實可行 的範圍內保存區內居民的社區網絡」。 要為保留社區網絡定下條件，亦即是為市建局留下了「不執行」的「名正言順」的理由。請問什麼叫「切實可行」？誰有權定義？定義了後公眾不滿，誰會問責？ 二） 新策略的「市區更新諮詢平台」 －－全委任制，赤裸剝削 ： 在舊策略中有一個「分區諮詢委員會」，裡面有兩個居民代表。雖然兩名代表實已只是花瓶效用，而事實上不聽話的代表往往很快被趕出委員會，但給街坊兩名代表都算是形式上的尊重。在新建議的「市區更新諮詢平台」當中，擺明全由政府委任，受影響人士完全無權發言，赤裸裸地剝奪受影響人士的參與的權利。所謂「以人為本」，已蕩然無存。 三）不再定期檢討《市區重建策略》： 在舊策略中第 39 條中列明 : 「市區重建策略會定期予以檢討和修訂（每兩至三年一次）。政府會就市區重建策略的修訂先行徵詢公眾意見，方予以定案，以供實施。 」 然而，這一條在新策略中，直接消失了！ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 其實, 在欠缺監管與問責,市民無權參與決策的情況下, 舊策略寫得不太差, 卻已無法落實執行,更別說, 新策略寫得倒退了! 發表留言 張貼在 公民社會的回應 《市區重建策略》:發展局諮詢文字紀錄的三大不老實 Posted on 17 十一月, 2010 by urbanrenewaltv | 發表留言 綜合下列義工校對發展局檢討網頁上文字、影像紀...
redirect type
0 (-)
block type
0 (no issues)
detected language
126 (language undetectable (empty document, too short, or engines disagree))
category id
Non-Latin articles (251)
index version
2025123101
spam phrases
0
text nonlatin
24844
text cyrillic
0
text characters
28873
text words
4269
text unique words
3062
text lines
1936
text sentences
171
text paragraphs
16
text words per sentence
24
text matched phrases
0
text matched dictionaries
0
links self subdomains
0
links other subdomains
0
links other domains
11 - ursreview.gov.hk, devb-plb.gov.hk, hkhs.com, districtcouncils.gov.hk, amo.gov.hk, info.gov.hk, ura.org.hk
links spam adult
0
links spam random
0
links spam expired
0
links ext activities
0
links ext ecommerce
0
links ext finance
0
links ext crypto
0
links ext booking
0
links ext news
0
links ext leaks
0
links ext ugc
26 - s0.wp.com, wp.me, s1.wp.com, wordpress.com
links ext klim
0
links ext generic
0
dol status
0
dol updated
2026-01-10 13:39:14
rss status
32 (unknown)
rss found date
2024-12-29 10:47:29
rss size orig
175184
rss items
10
rss spam phrases
0
rss detected language
126 (language undetectable (empty document, too short, or engines disagree))
inbefore feed id
-
inbefore status
0 (new)
sitemap path
sitemap status
40 (completed successful import of reports.txt file to table in_pages)
sitemap review version
2
sitemap urls count
25
sitemap urls adult
0
sitemap filtered products
0
sitemap filtered videos
0
sitemap found date
2024-12-29 10:47:28
sitemap process date
2025-02-14 06:56:32
sitemap first import date
-
sitemap last import date
2025-08-10 18:49:01