Main

processing priority

4

site type

0 (generic, awaiting analysis)

review version

11

html import

20 (imported)

Events

first seen date

2024-02-21 11:31:15

expired found date

-

created at

2024-06-02 07:05:22

updated at

2025-12-26 22:03:02

Domain name statistics

length

22

crc

20138

tld

2211

nm parts

0

nm random digits

0

nm rare letters

0

Connections

is subdomain of id

-

previous id

0

replaced with id

0

related id

-

dns primary id

157026106

dns alternative id

0

lifecycle status

0 (unclassified, or currently active)

Subdomains and pages

deleted subdomains

0

page imported products

0

page imported random

0

page imported parking

0

Error counters

count skipped due to recent timeouts on the same server IP

0

count content received but rejected due to 11-799

0

count dns errors

0

count cert errors

0

count timeouts

0

count http 429

0

count http 404

0

count http 403

0

count http 5xx

0

next operation date

-

Server

server bits

server ip

-

Mainpage statistics

mp import status

20

mp rejected date

-

mp saved date

-

mp size orig

164695

mp size raw text

72604

mp inner links count

12

mp inner links status

20 (imported)

Open Graph

title

description

image

site name

author

updated

2025-12-14 09:46:50

raw text

Property, intangible – a blog about ownership of intellectual property rights and its licensing Property, intangible a blog about ownership of intellectual property rights and its licensing May 22, 2023 What We Don’t Know in Warhol – Who the Infringer Is and By Doing What I expect to see a lot of reports that the recent Supreme Court decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith held that Andy Warhol’s Prince series of 16 works, or at least the “Orange Prince” that was licensed to Condé Nast, is an infringement of Lynn Goldsmith’s photograph. In fact, what the infringement was, and by whom, is a mystery. The Supreme Court described the infringement this way: Here, Goldsmith’s copyrighted photograph has been used in multiple ways. The Court limits its analysis to the specific use alleged to be infringing in this case – AWF’s commercial licensing of Orange Prince to Condé Nast – and expresses no opinion as to the creation, display, or sal...

Text analysis

redirect type

0 (-)

block type

0 (no issues)

detected language

1 (English)

category id

Prawo (24)

index version

2025110801

spam phrases

0

Text statistics

text nonlatin

0

text cyrillic

0

text characters

57629

text words

11511

text unique words

2242

text lines

555

text sentences

598

text paragraphs

155

text words per sentence

19

text matched phrases

25

text matched dictionaries

9

RSS

rss status

32 (unknown)

rss found date

2025-01-22 05:43:13

rss size orig

97483

rss items

10

rss spam phrases

0

rss detected language

1 (English)

inbefore feed id

-

inbefore status

0 (new)

Sitemap

sitemap status

34 (reserved: import paused pending content quality/relevance assessment after importing first 500 pages)

sitemap review version

2

sitemap urls count

802

sitemap urls adult

2

sitemap filtered products

0

sitemap filtered videos

0

sitemap found date

2024-03-03 02:49:12

sitemap process date

2025-01-24 17:33:30

sitemap first import date

-

sitemap last import date

2025-03-12 14:19:17