Main

processing priority

4

site type

3 (personal blog or private political site, e.g. Blogspot, Substack, also small blogs on own domains)

review version

11

html import

20 (imported)

Events

first seen date

2024-12-27 09:04:07

expired found date

-

created at

2024-12-27 09:04:07

updated at

2026-02-24 16:45:42

Domain name statistics

length

24

crc

23195

tld

2211

nm parts

0

nm random digits

0

nm rare letters

0

Connections

is subdomain of id

13642151 (wordpress.com)

previous id

0

replaced with id

0

related id

-

dns primary id

0

dns alternative id

0

lifecycle status

0 (unclassified, or currently active)

Subdomains and pages

deleted subdomains

0

page imported products

0

page imported random

0

page imported parking

0

Error counters

count skipped due to recent timeouts on the same server IP

0

count content received but rejected due to 11-799

0

count dns errors

0

count cert errors

0

count timeouts

0

count http 429

0

count http 404

0

count http 403

0

count http 5xx

0

next operation date

-

Server

server bits

server ip

-

Mainpage statistics

mp import status

20

mp rejected date

-

mp saved date

-

mp size orig

156489

mp size raw text

41794

mp inner links count

17

mp inner links status

20 (imported)

Open Graph

title

Skeptic Family

description

Science and Humanism for Parents

image

site name

Skeptic Family

author

updated

2026-02-17 16:09:13

raw text

Skeptic Family | Science and Humanism for Parents Skeptic Family Science and Humanism for Parents  Recommends Top Posts Vaccines Who Are We? Posted by: Ticktock | March 27, 2013 Pollakiuria, Anxiety, and the Google Problem I want to be a “proper” skeptic, to use my reasoning skills as a method of filtering out the nonsense in this world, but I have a Googling problem. Using a search tool to find answers may be lazy skepticism, but we all do it to some extent, don’t we? Search: “Rash on armpit” and any number of results can appear, but which are most relevant and reliable? Usually, it’s easy to tell a better web site when it cites proper sources, but you can never be too sure about the accuracy of any anonymous content. Plus, it’s still fairly impossible to know whether the answer you’re seeking about a rash involves lymph nodes or deodorant. For that, you need a doctor, but is it worth bothering a doctor about a rash? What if it’s nothing? What if it goes away?...

Text analysis

redirect type

0 (-)

block type

0 (no issues)

detected language

1 (English)

category id

Other [en] (231)

index version

2025123101

spam phrases

2

Text statistics

text nonlatin

0

text cyrillic

0

text characters

32616

text words

7035

text unique words

1983

text lines

422

text sentences

353

text paragraphs

95

text words per sentence

19

text matched phrases

31

text matched dictionaries

8

RSS

rss status

32 (unknown)

rss found date

2024-12-27 09:04:09

rss size orig

63307

rss items

10

rss spam phrases

2

rss detected language

1 (English)

inbefore feed id

-

inbefore status

0 (new)

Sitemap

sitemap status

40 (completed successful import of reports.txt file to table in_pages)

sitemap review version

2

sitemap urls count

584

sitemap urls adult

1

sitemap filtered products

0

sitemap filtered videos

0

sitemap found date

2024-12-27 09:04:11

sitemap process date

2025-03-24 18:55:47

sitemap first import date

-

sitemap last import date

2025-08-12 14:33:22