id
processing priority
4
site type
0 (generic, awaiting analysis)
review version
11
html import
40 (error)
first seen date
2024-03-16 04:03:57
expired found date
-
created at
2024-06-07 06:20:43
updated at
2025-12-30 10:54:20
length
20
crc
16991
tld
2211
nm parts
0
nm random digits
0
nm rare letters
0
is subdomain of id
-
previous id
0
replaced with id
0
related id
-
dns primary id
dns alternative id
0
lifecycle status
0 (unclassified, or currently active)
deleted subdomains
0
page imported products
0
page imported random
0
page imported parking
0
count skipped due to recent timeouts on the same server IP
0
count content received but rejected due to 11-799
0
count dns errors
0
count cert errors
0
count timeouts
0
count http 429
0
count http 404
0
count http 403
0
count http 5xx
0
next operation date
-
server bits
—
server ip
-
mp import status
20
mp rejected date
-
mp saved date
-
mp size orig
123634
mp size raw text
8092
mp inner links count
10
mp inner links status
20 (imported)
title
Patent Challenges
description
Patent Challenges provides reports, updates, commentary and insight on new decisions and other happenings related to post-issuance proceedings (IPR, PGR and CBM) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board o
image
https://www.patentchallenges.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/397/2021/10/Blog-Network-Meta-Image_1.png
site name
Patent Challenges
author
updated
2025-12-18 10:26:55
raw text
Patent Challenges | Analysis of USPTO post-issuance proceedings | Norton Rose Fulbright A “known technique” only needs to be a suitable replacement to support a conclusion of obviousness By Vlada Wendel (US) and Michael Pohl (US) on March 21, 2023 Posted in General A claim that recites a combination of prior art elements may be obvious when the combination merely involves the use of a “known technique” that “has been used to improve one device” to “improve similar devices in the same way.” KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. 398, 417 (2007). In Intel Corp. v. … Continue reading Tweet this post Like this post Email this post Share this post on LinkedIn Tags: known technique Don’t Xerox conclusory assertions in the expert declaration By Michael Pohl (US) on February 21, 2023 Posted in General Expert testimony can be critical to support or defend against invalidity challenges in AIA trials, but must be adequately explained to be effective. I...
redirect type
31 (document.location)
block type
0 (no issues)
detected language
1 (English)
category id
index version
2025110801
spam phrases
0
text nonlatin
0
text cyrillic
0
text characters
6304
text words
1209
text unique words
448
text lines
197
text sentences
53
text paragraphs
9
text words per sentence
22
text matched phrases
8
text matched dictionaries
5
links self subdomains
0
links other subdomains
0
links other domains
47 - nortonrosefulbright.com, consumerproductslawblog.com, dataprotectionreport.com, deallawwire.com, financialinstitutionslegalsnapshot.com, regulationtomorrow.com, globalworkplaceinsider.com, thehealthlawpulse.com, hydraulicfrackingblog.com, insideafricalaw.com, insidebrexitlaw.com, actifscreatifs.com, pharmainbrief.com, projectfinance.law, securitieslitigation.blog, socialmedialawbulletin.com, specialsituationslaw.com, zoneofinsolvencyblog.com, lexblog.com
links spam adult
0
links spam random
0
links spam expired
0
links ext activities
0
links ext ecommerce
0
links ext finance
0
links ext crypto
0
links ext booking
0
links ext news
0
links ext leaks
0
links ext ugc
40 - twitter.com, facebook.com, linkedin.com, feeds.feedburner.com, youtube.com
links ext klim
0
links ext generic
0
dol status
0
dol updated
2025-12-18 10:26:55
rss status
32 (unknown)
rss found date
2024-03-19 06:09:24
rss size orig
44175
rss items
10
rss spam phrases
0
rss detected language
1 (English)
inbefore feed id
-
inbefore status
0 (new)
sitemap path
sitemap status
30 (processing completed, results pushed to table crawler_sitemaps.ext_domain_sitemap_lists)
sitemap review version
2
sitemap urls count
113
sitemap urls adult
0
sitemap filtered products
0
sitemap filtered videos
0
sitemap found date
2024-03-19 05:35:03
sitemap process date
2025-05-10 20:37:17
sitemap first import date
-
sitemap last import date
-