id
processing priority
4
site type
3 (personal blog or private political site, e.g. Blogspot, Substack, also small blogs on own domains)
review version
11
html import
20 (imported)
first seen date
2024-10-27 11:03:23
expired found date
-
created at
2024-10-27 11:03:23
updated at
2026-02-24 10:54:45
length
25
crc
16837
tld
2211
nm parts
0
nm random digits
0
nm rare letters
0
is subdomain of id
13642151 (wordpress.com)
previous id
0
replaced with id
0
related id
-
dns primary id
0
dns alternative id
0
lifecycle status
0 (unclassified, or currently active)
deleted subdomains
0
page imported products
0
page imported random
0
page imported parking
0
count skipped due to recent timeouts on the same server IP
0
count content received but rejected due to 11-799
0
count dns errors
0
count cert errors
0
count timeouts
0
count http 429
0
count http 404
0
count http 403
0
count http 5xx
0
next operation date
-
server bits
—
server ip
-
mp import status
20
mp rejected date
-
mp saved date
-
mp size orig
192084
mp size raw text
54072
mp inner links count
11
mp inner links status
20 (imported)
title
(no title)
description
rafaDelNero
site name
author
updated
2026-02-22 04:19:43
raw text
rafaDelNero Skip to content rafaDelNero Twitter Github Linkedin Youtube MailChimp Facebook Sidebar Refactor Bad Code Series #2: What does that f$#&ing method/variable name mean? February 27, 2018 March 4, 2018 rafaDelNero Leave a comment Method Naming – The problem of a bad method name Method names that don’t describe what they are expected to do are confusing. There are methods that are the “ Mr. Know-It-All ” – they do everything you could imagine: they create, update, save, delete, save again, delete again, they can return an Exception code or throw an Exception … You must be thinking, “Please stop! I can’t take this anymore!” Yes, these methods are like a nightmare. They are the kind of methods that even the creator doesn’t know what is happening. Developers just invoke the method because it works. But nobody has the guts to change a method like this. If it has a bug, most developers will just code around it. Also, there are the methods name...
redirect type
31 (document.location)
block type
0 (no issues)
detected language
1 (English)
category id
index version
1
spam phrases
0
text nonlatin
0
text cyrillic
0
text characters
40414
text words
7815
text unique words
1292
text lines
1210
text sentences
434
text paragraphs
109
text words per sentence
18
text matched phrases
0
text matched dictionaries
0
links self subdomains
0
links other subdomains
1 - wiki.c2.com
links other domains
17 - eepurl.com, nobugsproject.com, oracle.com, keepcalmandrefactor.com
links spam adult
0
links spam random
0
links spam expired
0
links ext activities
0
links ext ecommerce
1 - amazon.com
links ext finance
0
links ext crypto
0
links ext booking
0
links ext news
0
links ext leaks
0
links ext ugc
46 - s0.wp.com, wp.me, s1.wp.com, wordpress.com, twitter.com, linkedin.com, youtube.com, facebook.com, en.wikipedia.org
links ext klim
0
links ext generic
0
dol status
0
dol updated
2026-02-22 04:19:43
rss status
32 (unknown)
rss found date
2024-10-27 11:03:24
rss size orig
15172
rss items
10
rss spam phrases
0
rss detected language
1 (English)
inbefore feed id
-
inbefore status
0 (new)
sitemap path
sitemap status
40 (completed successful import of reports.txt file to table in_pages)
sitemap review version
2
sitemap urls count
55
sitemap urls adult
0
sitemap filtered products
0
sitemap filtered videos
0
sitemap found date
2024-10-27 11:03:24
sitemap process date
2024-10-27 11:03:24
sitemap first import date
-
sitemap last import date
2025-11-11 23:48:16